Rostec's United Aircraft Corporation announced August 27 it had delivered another batch of Su-35S multirole fighters to the Russian Aerospace Forces, the third confirmed delivery of 2026, following batches in April and May. As with the Su-34 production announcements this blog covered days earlier, UAC disclosed no aircraft count and no receiving unit, defense analyst Guy Plopsky's own review of the released photos and video counting only "two or more" airframes, the same pattern of celebratory, deliberately vague batch announcements this blog's Su-34 coverage already flagged as a consistent Russian messaging habit rather than a one-off omission.
The detail worth foregrounding here, and one this blog's earlier Su-34 coverage didn't have visibility into, is a genuinely significant complication buried in this blog's own research: Militarywatch's prior reporting indicates a substantial and possibly growing share of current Su-35 production capacity, potentially close to half, is being allocated to Iranian export orders rather than the Russian Aerospace Forces at all. That's a direct, material qualifier on every one of this year's three "delivered to the VKS" announcements, if accurate, it means Russia's own frontline Su-35 fleet may be growing considerably more slowly than the raw batch-announcement cadence implies, with a meaningful fraction of Komsomolsk-on-Amur's total output flowing to a foreign customer rather than reinforcing VKS squadrons.
This connects directly to the disclosed-versus-verified gap this blog's Su-34 coverage established as a structural feature of Russian aviation production reporting generally. Applying the same Oryx open-source tracking standard this blog used for the Su-34, independent documentation now lists nine Russian Su-35S aircraft visually confirmed destroyed since the invasion began, with Ukraine's own Air Force claiming a tenth shot down on the eastern front as recently as July 8, 2026, just weeks before this latest celebratory delivery announcement. Set against a production rate this blog's research suggests runs around two aircraft per batch, three batches disclosed so far this year, a genuinely serious question about net fleet growth remains just as unresolved for the Su-35 as this blog's earlier reporting found for the Su-34, celebratory delivery language with no quantities, against independently documented, considerably more granular loss figures the producing state has no incentive to reference in its own announcements.
The combat-claims dimension worth setting against this blog's own summer-long skepticism toward unverified Russian assertions: this blog's research turned up claims of seven confirmed Su-35 air-to-air kills against Ukrainian fighters plus one helicopter, a tally that should be read with the same caution this blog applied to the disputed Su-35-versus-Su-27 "two kills in one engagement" claim covered earlier this summer, unconfirmed Russian Ministry of Defense-sourced figures rather than independently verified outcomes. The pilot testimonial quoted in Rostec's own announcement, "this equipment works without complaints, the crew finds it comfortable to fly," is standard morale-boosting messaging accompanying literally every batch delivery this blog's research surfaced going back to 2025, not a substantive operational assessment.
The export-market context genuinely does distinguish the Su-35 story from the Su-34's, though, and it's worth noting as a real difference rather than flattening both programs into an identical pattern. This blog's research indicates 2025 marked a genuine turnaround in Su-35 export performance after years of underwhelming foreign sales, with expanded Iranian orders now cited as a primary driver reversing Russia's broader defense-export decline since 2022. That's a meaningfully different commercial trajectory than the Su-34, which this blog's earlier coverage found exporting only to Algeria at comparatively modest volume. Whether prioritizing Iranian export orders over VKS fleet replenishment reflects genuine confidence in current Su-35 stocks or a harder tradeoff between foreign currency earnings and domestic readiness is a question this blog's available sourcing can't resolve, but it's the kind of structural detail that deserves to travel alongside every future "new batch delivered" headline rather than getting lost beneath the celebratory framing those announcements consistently lead with.
No comments:
Post a Comment